Skip to content
The Financial Darwin Awards logo The Financial Darwin Awards

Every loss on this page was somebody else's decision

A utility repriced by a legislature that went home, a crude short caught by a weekend strike, an airline that pays for the same barrel, and a moat dissolved by one Saturday post.

GM. This is The Financial Darwin Awards, the only financial newsletter with a 100% loss rate.

Monday was decided over the weekend, in rooms none of these people were sitting in.

A committee in Sacramento went home without a liability cap.

A pilot hit two launchers on an island in the Strait of Hormuz.

A man typed a sentence about turbine blades on a Saturday.

Four traders lost $109,450 between them, and not one of them was beaten by the market.

The traders are composites. The moves are not.

Here's what we've got today:

🎯Owned a utility because utilities are safe. The legislature was not consulted.
📈Short crude oil. Over a weekend. Next to the Strait of Hormuz.
📉Long an airline on the day a strait got shot at.
🔥Owned a moat that one post turned into a rumour.
🤡Dumb memes from the trenches.
 
🎯
 

THIS WEEK'S DAMAGE REPORT 📊

$109K

Lost This Week

$6B

The Liability Cap California Left Out

∞

Lessons Ignored

The first number is the sum of the four stories below. The second is real: California's Senate Bill 492 advanced without the $6 billion per-incident wildfire liability cap the utilities wanted, and Edison International closed Monday at $53.98, down 23.07%.

 
🏆
 

DARWIN AWARD OF THE WEEK 🏆

Every issue we crown the single worst financial decision on the internet.

This week it goes to a man who bought the safest thing in his portfolio and lost a quarter of it in a single session.

Here's the setup.

u/regulated_utility_means_safe owned 3,000 shares of Edison International, about $210,500 of stock at Friday's close of $70.17.

He did not own it for growth. He owned it because it yielded almost 5% and because it sells electricity to people who are legally required to buy electricity from it.

What he was actually holding was a position in a California legislative calendar.

The 2026 session ended on Monday, August 31. Senate Bill 492 was the bill the utilities needed, and it advanced over the weekend.

It sped up claims payments to wildfire victims and strengthened wildfire data sharing.

It did not include a $6 billion per-incident liability cap, and it did not include Governor Newsom's proposal to stop insurers suing utilities over wildfire damage.

It also left the 2028 sunset on the continuation fund in place, with no mechanism to refill the Wildfire Fund once it empties.

The bill passed. The clause he owned the stock for did not.

Edison International closed at $53.98, down $16.19, or 23.07%.

3,000 shares, down $16.19 each, is $48,570 in one session.

He did the analysis on the company. The decision was taken in a building the company does not own.

Brokerage screenshot: 3,000 Edison International shares held long, position down $48,570.00, after EIX closed at $53.98, down 23.07 percent when California's wildfire bill left out a liability cap.
R
u/regulated_utility_means_safe
r/dividends • 5h ago

Owned a regulated utility for the yield. Lost four years of it in one session.

The rate base is real and the customers cannot go anywhere else.

None of that was on the agenda in Sacramento on the last day of the session.

"I did the utility analysis. The trade was a bill."

 
⬆ 9.3k    💬 2.8k    🏆 402 awards

Here's the thing. A regulated utility is a company whose profits are set by people who are not its shareholders.

That is exactly why the earnings look predictable, and it is exactly why the equity is not.

The same pen that guarantees a return can decline to cap a liability, and on Monday it declined.

Mizuho cut Edison to neutral with a $70 price target, and the stock closed roughly $16 underneath it.

PG&E fell about 20% to $13.27 on the same news, with BMO putting its wildfire liability at $10 a share. Sempra lost about 2%.

That is the part worth understanding, and it cost him $48,570 to learn that in a regulated utility the regulation is not a footnote, it is the asset.

Why a utility is a political instrument, stated plainly: A regulated utility is granted a monopoly over a territory and, in exchange, hands a legislature and a commission the right to decide what it may charge and what it must pay for. That arrangement is what makes the cash flows smooth enough to be treated as a bond substitute, and it is also what makes the equity a leveraged claim on political goodwill. When a state lets a utility be sued without limit for fires its equipment starts, the liability has no ceiling, and a company with no ceiling on its losses cannot be valued off its dividend. Nothing about the poles, the wires or the customers changed on Monday. What changed was the answer to the question of who pays when they burn.

 
💀
 

THIS WEEK'S CASUALTIES 💀

Not everybody can be Darwin Award of the week. These three gave it a real shot.

Let's run through the tape.

Casualty #1: The Man Who Was Short A Strait

u/hormuz_is_priced_in was short 12 crude oil futures contracts going into the weekend, 12,000 barrels, a little over a million dollars of oil.

His case was not silly. Iran headlines had arrived all summer and faded within two sessions almost every time.

On Sunday, US forces hit two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz.

It was the first acknowledged strike on Iranian soil since late July, and Iranian media reported on Monday that Iran had answered by hitting American bases in Jordan and the United Arab Emirates.

Roughly one fifth of the world's oil flows through that strait.

WTI closed Monday at $85.76, up $2.36, and Brent finished at $90.49, up 2.71%.

12,000 barrels, $2.36 the wrong way, is $28,320.

The headline landed on a Sunday, which is the one part of the week when he could not do anything about it.

Futures terminal screenshot: 12 WTI crude oil contracts held short, 12,000 barrels, position down $28,320.00, after crude closed at $85.76, up 2.83 percent following the Strait of Hormuz strike.
H
u/hormuz_is_priced_in
r/FuturesTrading • 7h ago

Short crude into a weekend, next to the one waterway that matters.

Every Iran headline this summer faded inside two sessions, so I sized this one like it would fade too.

It did not fade, and there was nowhere to put a stop between Friday and Sunday night.

"I was not short oil. I was short a news cycle."

 
⬆ 6.1k    💬 1.9k    📈 gapped

Why a short in oil is not a short in a stock, stated plainly: A company can only fall to zero, which caps what a long can lose, and the same arithmetic run backwards is what makes a short so awkward: the price above you has no ceiling at all. Crude adds a second problem, because the thing that moves it fastest is not demand, which drifts, but supply, which can be interrupted in an afternoon by a decision taken thousands of miles away. A tanker route that carries a fifth of the world's oil is therefore not a macro variable, it is a switch. And futures trade around a weekend that equities do not, so the position that looked flat on Friday afternoon can be marked against you before you have had a chance to look at it.

Casualty #2: The Man Who Was Long The Barrel Twice

u/jet_fuel_is_a_rounding_error owned 9,000 shares of Delta Air Lines, about $720,000 at Friday's close of $80.07, a good part of it borrowed.

His case was the consensus one. Travel demand is strong, the airlines have been disciplined about capacity, and the stock looked cheap on earnings.

None of that is wrong. It is simply not the variable that moves the stock.

An airline is a business that buys jet fuel and sells seats, and fuel is normally its largest cost after people.

So when crude rose 2.83% on Monday, the airlines did not need any news of their own.

Delta closed at $78.00, down $2.07, or 2.59%. United fell 2.36% to $107.99.

9,000 shares, down $2.07 each, is $18,630.

He and u/hormuz_is_priced_in were positioned on opposite sides of the same barrel, and the barrel took money off both of them.

Brokerage screenshot: 9,000 Delta Air Lines shares held long, position down $18,630.00, after DAL closed at $78.00, down 2.59 percent on the day crude oil rose 2.83 percent.
J
u/jet_fuel_is_a_rounding_error
r/StockMarket • 4h ago

Bought an airline on the travel story. Got repriced by a strait I cannot find on a map.

Load factors are strong, capacity is disciplined, and none of that was the input that moved today.

Turns out I did not own a travel company, I owned a short position in crude with a loyalty programme.

"I researched the seats. The trade was the fuel."

 
⬆ 7.5k    💬 2.1k    📉 fuelled

Why an airline is a commodity position in disguise, stated plainly: An airline sells a ticket weeks or months before it flies the passenger, and it buys the fuel to fly them at whatever the price happens to be on the day, which means the revenue is fixed early and the largest variable cost is settled late. Margins in the industry are thin enough that a modest move in crude swings the profit far more than a modest move in bookings does, so the equity behaves like a leveraged short position in oil with an airline attached. Carriers hedge some of that exposure, but hedging is partial, it is expensive, and it lags, so it softens the move rather than removing it. The practical version is simple: if you would not knowingly short crude, be careful what you are actually holding when you buy an airline.

Casualty #3: The Man Who Owned A Moat

u/a_tweet_is_not_a_factory owned 700 shares of Howmet Aerospace, about $185,400 at Friday's close of $264.85.

The thesis was the good kind. Very few companies can cast the blades and vanes that go inside a gas turbine, and everybody building a data centre wants gas turbines.

On Saturday, Elon Musk wrote that "the limiting factor for nat gas turbine production is casting the blades & vanes."

He added that in-house casting at SpaceX could "accelerate nat gas turbines coming online by up to 18 months." Monday was the first session anyone could trade it.

Howmet closed at $244.95, down $19.90, or 7.51%.

700 shares, down $19.90 each, is $13,930.

GE Vernova fell about 2.3% and Siemens Energy lost about 4.6% in Frankfurt on the same sentence.

Bernstein's reply was that Howmet remains well positioned despite the plan.

No foundry was built and no blade was cast. A description of a factory removed $13,930 from his account.

Brokerage screenshot: 700 Howmet Aerospace shares held long, position down $13,930.00, after HWM closed at $244.95, down 7.51 percent on Elon Musk's SpaceX turbine-blade casting plan.
A
u/a_tweet_is_not_a_factory
r/stocks • 6h ago

Owned the bottleneck. A man announced he might stop being bottlenecked.

The plant does not exist, the castings do not exist, and SpaceX is not even a customer yet.

Bernstein says the position is fine, which is lovely, and the tape says the moat is now a debate.

"I was long a monopoly and short a posting schedule."

 
⬆ 4.7k    💬 1.4k    🔥 announced

Why an announcement moves a stock before a product does, stated plainly: A company that is the only credible supplier of something scarce earns two things, a good margin now and a high multiple on that margin, and the multiple is by far the larger part of the share price. The margin is protected by furnaces, patents and decades of process knowledge, all of which are slow to copy. The multiple is protected by nothing but the belief that nobody will try. So a credible rival saying out loud that it intends to try can take several points off the stock on a day when the actual business is completely unchanged, and it will keep taking them until either the rival ships or the market gets bored of waiting.

 
📊
 

THIS WEEK BY THE NUMBERS 📊

We track the data because the data is funnier than anything we could make up.

🎯

$6B

the per-incident wildfire liability cap SB 492 left out

📈

$90.49

Brent's close, up 2.71% after the Hormuz strike

📉

20%

of the world's oil moves through the strait that was hit on Sunday

🔥

18 months

the speed-up Musk claims from casting blades in-house

Not one of Monday's four losses came from a company doing worse business.

A legislature adjourned, a launcher was hit, and a man posted on a Saturday. Everything else on this page is the invoice.

 
🍪
 

BITE-SIZED COPIUM FOR THE ROAD 🍪

The best part of any loss thread isn't the screenshot. It's the comments section.

Here are this week's greatest hits.

• "They have to pass something eventually." Eventually is not a legislative session, and this one closed on Monday. (u/they_have_to_pass_something)
• "It gapped, I never got the chance to exit." That was the risk, not the excuse. (u/it_gapped_against_me)
• "Airlines hedge their fuel." Partly, late, and at a price. The equity does not. (u/we_hedge_most_of_it)
• "SpaceX cannot cast a turbine blade this year." Correct, and the stock fell 7.51% anyway. (u/moats_take_years)

Translation: everybody owned a defensible asset. Nobody had a vote on what it was worth.

 
🤣
 

DUMB MEMES 🤣

Every newsletter needs a meme section.

Ours just hits different when the damage was authorised by people you have never met.

📢 💀 📉

one sentence, one session, one moat

POV: your bottleneck got a press release

🔥📈   ✈️📉

one barrel, two funerals

POV: you shorted the oil and he owned the people who burn it

If you laughed, you're coping.

If you didn't laugh, go and find out who is voting on something you own this week.

See you next issue.

New rooms. Same people paying for them.

 

Traders and P&L screenshots are satirical composites. Market data, price moves and quotations are real and dated August 28 to 31, 2026. Not financial advice. Obviously. Look at us.

Stay liquid,
The Financial Darwin Awards

Free, 4x a week

Learn from other people's worst trades.

Five minutes of reading. A lifetime of bad decisions to study. Your portfolio will thank you, eventually.

No spam. Just other people's mistakes.

Almost there. Check your inbox to confirm.