Skip to content
The Financial Darwin Awards logo The Financial Darwin Awards

Everybody called the hike. Nobody got paid.

The Fed raised rates 25 basis points on a unanimous vote, exactly as priced. A trucker lost 13.30% to diesel at a record $6.31, a curve trade lost money because the hike worked, and a short lost to a launch date. None of the three was really a bet on the Fed.

GM. This is The Financial Darwin Awards, rounding up the internet's biggest Ls so you don't make them yourself.

The Fed raised rates 25 basis points yesterday to 3.75% to 4.00%, its first hike since July 2023. The vote was 12 to 0.

Everyone saw it coming. Three people who saw it coming lost money anyway.

Three people lost $69,390 between them.

None of their positions was actually a bet on the Fed. They just thought it was.

The traders are composites. The moves are not.

Here's what we've got today:

🔥"The fuel surcharge covers it." Diesel hit $6.31 a gallon.
🧮"Hiking into inflation steepens the curve." It flattened.
🚀"Starship always slips." They published a date.
🤣Dumb memes from the trenches.
 
🧨
 

THIS WEEK'S DAMAGE REPORT 📊

$69K

Lost This Week

$6.31

Diesel, A Gallon, All-Time High

∞

Lessons Ignored

The first number is the sum of the three stories below. The second is real: the national average for diesel reached $6.31 a gallon on Wednesday, an all-time high, after rising nearly 69 cents in the fortnight to September 14.

 
🏆
 

DARWIN AWARD OF THE WEEK 🏆

Every issue we crown the single worst financial decision on the internet. This week it goes to a man who spent the day watching the Fed while his position was being decided at a truck stop.

Here's the setup.

u/the_surcharge_covers_it owned 900 J.B. Hunt shares, about $245,745, at Tuesday's close of $273.05.

His thesis was sound and widely held. Trucking companies bill fuel separately, so when diesel rises the surcharge rises with it and the carrier is roughly neutral.

That is true across a year. It is not true across a quarter.

Surcharges reset on a lag, they are negotiated against benchmark prices rather than the pump, and on contract freight the customer has already signed.

Diesel first crossed $6 a gallon on September 11. On Wednesday the national average hit $6.31, an all-time high, beating the $5.81 record set in June 2022.

California went past $8.

At a Morgan Stanley conference that morning, finance chief Brad Delco warned that earnings would fall 5% to 10% from the second quarter to the third, citing "some of the most radical and abnormal swings in fuel prices that I think we've ever seen."

J.B. Hunt closed at $236.73, down $36.32, or 13.30%.

900 shares, down $36.32 each, is $32,688.

He was positioned for a Fed meeting. He was short a commodity he did not know he owned.

Brokerage screenshot: 900 J.B. Hunt Transport shares held long from $273.05, position down $32,688.00, after JBHT closed at $236.73, down $36.32 or 13.30 percent, when the company warned third-quarter earnings would fall on record diesel prices.
T
u/the_surcharge_covers_it
r/stocks • 4h ago

Owned a trucker through a Fed meeting. The Fed was not the problem.

"I knew fuel was a pass-through. Nobody told me how long the through takes."

 
['⬆ 12.1k    💬 3.3k    🔥 $6.31']

Here's the thing. A cost that is contractually passed on is still a cost you carry for the length of the contract, and that gap is where a quarter gets lost.

That is the part worth understanding, and it cost him $32,688 to learn that a pass-through is a timing difference, not a hedge.

How a fuel surcharge actually works, stated plainly: Carriers bill fuel as a separate line, indexed to a published diesel benchmark and usually reset weekly or monthly. When the pump moves faster than the index resets, the carrier eats the gap. Spot loads reprice quickly; contract freight does not reprice at all.

 
💀
 

THIS WEEK'S CASUALTIES 💀

Not everybody can be Darwin Award of the week. These two were watching the right event.

Casualty #1: The Man Who Was Right About The Fed

u/hiking_steepens_it was in a two-year against thirty-year steepener, sized at $3,000 a basis point.

The trade is a bet that the gap between short and long yields widens. His reasoning was ordinary and almost right.

A central bank hiking into 3% inflation should scare the long end, because bond buyers thirty years out are the ones who pay for inflation.

He had the hike correct. The Fed went 25 basis points to 3.75% to 4.00% on a unanimous vote, and the median official in the dot plot put another hike before the year is out.

And the long end fell.

The two-year rose 7.1 basis points to 4.734%. The thirty-year eased to 5.356%.

That is what a credible hike does. The bond market had been asking for one, and a central bank that acts on inflation lowers the inflation you have to be paid for over thirty years.

The gap went from 70.0 basis points to 62.2. It flattened by 7.8.

7.8 basis points, at $3,000 each, is $23,400.

Brokerage screenshot: a two-year against thirty-year Treasury steepener sized at $3,000 a basis point, position down $23,400.00, after the curve flattened 7.8 basis points on the day the Federal Reserve raised rates to 3.75 to 4.00 percent.
H
u/hiking_steepens_it
r/bonds • 2h ago

Called the hike, called the dot plot, lost money on the curve.

"I was positioned for the Fed to be behind. The Fed caught up and that was the bad outcome."

 
['⬆ 9.2k    💬 2.7k    🧮 -7.8bp']

Here's the thing. The long end does not price the policy rate, it prices confidence that somebody is minding the policy rate, and those two move in opposite directions.

That is the part worth understanding, and it cost him $23,400 to learn that hawkish and steeper are not the same word.

Why a rate hike can flatten the curve, stated plainly: Short yields track what the central bank is doing now, so a hike lifts them mechanically. Long yields carry an inflation premium instead, and that premium shrinks when the bank proves it will act. Tightening raises the front and can lower the back at the same time.

Casualty #2: The Man Who Was Right About The Rocket

u/it_always_slips was short 1,800 SpaceX shares, about $258,282, from Tuesday's close of $143.49.

His record on the engineering was excellent. Starship timelines had slipped repeatedly, and he had been paid for saying so more than once.

On Wednesday, SpaceX did not launch anything. It announced that the first orbital attempt would be on September 22.

SpaceX closed at $150.88, up $7.39, or 5.15%.

1,800 shares, against him by $7.39 each, is $13,302.

He is still short into a launch that has not happened yet, which is the part he should be thinking about.

Brokerage screenshot: 1,800 SpaceX shares held short from $143.49, position down $13,302.00, after SPCX closed at $150.88, up $7.39 or 5.15 percent, when the company set September 22 as the date for Starship first orbital attempt.
I
u/it_always_slips
r/wallstreetbets • 1h ago

Shorted the rocket because it always slips. They did not launch. They published a date.

"I was short the outcome. The market was long the calendar."

 
['⬆ 8.8k    💬 2.4k    🚀 Sept 22']

Here's the thing. A company with a story and no earnings is repriced by news about the story, and a confirmed date is news even though nothing has been built or proved.

That is the part worth understanding, and it cost him $13,302 to learn that a schedule is an event.

Why a date moves a pre-revenue stock, stated plainly: With no cash flows to discount, the price is a probability of something working multiplied by what it would be worth. A firm date raises that probability slightly and removes some of the discount for delay. The test still has to be passed, but the waiting got shorter.

 
📊
 

THIS WEEK BY THE NUMBERS 📊

We track the data because the data is funnier than anything we could invent.

The Dow fell 631 points, or 1.2%, while the Nasdaq finished almost exactly flat.

The index that owns the machinery had a bad day. The index that owns the software did not notice.

 
🍪
 

BITE-SIZED COPIUM FOR THE ROAD 🍪

The best part of any loss thread is the comments.

• "Fuel surcharges pass the cost through." Eventually. (u/surcharges_pass_through)
• "Hiking into inflation steepens the curve." Only if nobody believes the hiking. (u/hikes_mean_steepeners)
• "Starship always slips." It still might. He was not paid for that. (u/starship_always_slips)

Translation: three correct opinions about the world, three wrong opinions about the price.

 
🤣
 

DUMB MEMES 🤣

Ours hits different when you called the event and still paid.

🔥 ➡️ 📉 😭

the pump, the surcharge, the quarter

POV: your hedge resets monthly and diesel does not

🧮 📈 💀

the hike, the flattening, the steepener

u/hiking_steepens_it, right about everything except the sign

If you laughed, you're coping. If you didn't, go and work out which input your biggest position is really short of.

See you next issue.

Everybody called the hike. Nobody got paid.

 

Traders and P&L screenshots are satirical composites. Market data, Federal Reserve decisions and price moves are real and dated September 16, 2026. Not financial advice.

Stay liquid,
The Financial Darwin Awards

Free, 4x a week

Learn from other people's worst trades.

Five minutes of reading. A lifetime of bad decisions to study. Your portfolio will thank you, eventually.

No spam. Just other people's mistakes.

Almost there. Check your inbox to confirm.